In
Svezzese v. Duratek, Inc., the Fourth Circuit in an per curiam opinion for the panel of Judges Luttig, Motz, and Shedd affirmed the dismissal of securities fraud claims brought against a company engaged in waste processing, where the company had erred in its estimation of its costs, which turned out to be higher than expected, leading to a restatement of its financial position. The Court concluded that the complaint failed to meet the heightened pleading requirement as to motive, concluding that "[n]one of these allegations evidence fraudulent intent or recklessness sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss."
No comments:
Post a Comment