Where are the law professors acknowledging their foolishness

From the comments on the ACSBlog, this one sums it up, as it says regarding the Solomon Act case:

"The Solomon case was a litmus test to see who believes that the Constitution means 'what I like is required; what I dislike is forbidden.' It amazes me that, even today, after a 8-0 drubbing that included the more liberal justices, anyone thinks this was a difficult issue."