Tuesday, July 16, 2019
Temporary injunction entered against Title IX proceeding against U.Va. student for off-campus incident involving non-student
In Doe v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, Senior Judge Conrad entered a temporary injunction brought against a student of the University of Virginia based on an off-campus incident with a non-student.
When the Virginia sheriff detains people for the ICE
In Rios v. Jenkins, Senior Judge Conrad dismissed for failure to state a claim a section 1983 action challenging the policy of the sheriff of Culpepper County to detain persons arrested for misdemeanors for up to 48 hours at the request of the ICE.
On the constitutionality of the Virginia statute prohibiting the sale of alcohol to habitual drunkards
In Manning v. Caldwell, the Fourth Circuit in an opinion by Judges Motz and Keenan, joined by Chief Judge Gregory and Judges King, Wynn, Floyd, Thacker, and Harris, reversed the dismissal for failure to state a claim in a constitutional challenge based on vagueness to the provisions of Va. Code 4.1-333, which allows a Virginia court to enter an order prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages to a person who has been adjudged to be a habitual drunkard.
Judge Keenan also wrote a separate opinion, joined by Judge Motz and Judge Thacker, responding to the dissent.
Judge Wilkinson wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Judges Niemeyer, Agee, Richardson, Quattlebaum, and Senior Judge Duncan.
Judge Wilkinson wrote a separate little opinion responding to Judge Keenan, his fellow Virginian.
Judge Diaz wrote a separate dissenting opinion, saying that the vagueness claim on the merits was no good.
The whole thing is 83 pages, some of it more accessible and some of it less accessible.
Judge Keenan also wrote a separate opinion, joined by Judge Motz and Judge Thacker, responding to the dissent.
Judge Wilkinson wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Judges Niemeyer, Agee, Richardson, Quattlebaum, and Senior Judge Duncan.
Judge Wilkinson wrote a separate little opinion responding to Judge Keenan, his fellow Virginian.
Judge Diaz wrote a separate dissenting opinion, saying that the vagueness claim on the merits was no good.
The whole thing is 83 pages, some of it more accessible and some of it less accessible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)